This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

BLOG MyyyyyAsssss

The rectal division of Manitoulin Island Web Design
~ Here is the post you wanted to read ~

BLOGmmmmmyasssss Permalink:

Jimmy Carter, Peanut Farmer or Jew Hater

It seems that the ex-president has written a new book. He's made a lot more enemies with this one as he's demonstrated that he's either living on his own planet or his anti-semetic feelings have taken over the controlling portion of what should be his brain. Maybe Mars executives were right taking out all peanut content from their chocolate bars!

The Key Monk describes it:

Kenneth Stein, first executive director of the Carter Center for Middle East Studies at Emory University resigned as a fellow of the Carter Center after reading former Pres. Carter's latest anti-Israel, anti-US screed.

Good on ya, Professor.

This pro-Israeli website says:

Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who achieved a historic breakthrough in 1979 that brought peace between Egypt and Israel, has emerged over the years as one of Israel’s harshest critics. In his new book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, President Carter abandons all objectivity and unabashedly acts as a virtual spokesman for the Palestinian cause.
Some of President Carter’s key allegations in Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid:
   ~  Israel’s “occupation and colonialization” of the West Bank and Gaza is the reason there is no peace.
   ~  Israel’s ‘Wall’ has virtually choked-off the Palestinian economy and in many ways is worse than South Africa’s former Apartheid system.
   ~  The actions of Israeli governments do not reflect the will of the people who, in polls consistently show that Israelis overwhelming support a two-state solution.
   ~  President Carter blames “powerful political, economic and religious forces” in the U.S. for America’s "submissive" pro-Israel policies.

In an article in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Stein said,"President Carter's book on the Middle East, a title too inflammatory to even print, is not based on unvarnished analysis; it is replete with factual errors, copied materials not cited, superficialities, glaring omissions, and simply invented segments. Aside from the one-sided nature of the book, meant to provoke, there are recollections cited from meetings where I was the third person in the room, and my notes of those meetings show little similarity to points claimed in the book."

Tick to Return to Blog